Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Afterwards the guy endured so you can hope
That it declaration of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi basically got rid of the menstruating women on the regular monthly period group and you may set him or her about unusual position of zava since most typical attacks history at the least three days. Frequently his matter are one to because of the cutting-edge clarifications necessary to determine whenever a person is niddah and in case it’s possible to end up being an excellent zava, one to you are going to arrived at get wrong having grievous consequences. First this new decree got restricted click this over here now perception; it appears to possess been regional, and will was limited to times when doubt are involved and local population was not good enough discovered to choose during the instance activities ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi ). Certainly it wasn’t a standard decree for everyone out-of Israel, it try the initial step in this assistance. In the first a couple advice, Rabbi’s report works together with a woman just who can be a small zava or may be an excellent niddah. The woman is addressed in the first case just like the an effective niddah, having good 7-big date age of impurity, in lieu of one-day off impurity during the day from bleeding, the signal to own a minor zava. Regarding 2nd analogy she’s managed because good niddah and you can a minor zava in the event the first-day had been in her ziva several months (brand new 11 weeks anywhere between monthly period symptoms). In the 3rd condition, she’s managed while the a whole zava. All the about three rulings make the more strict status.
BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s declaration: “Roentgen
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. Amoraim could not dispute tannaitic rulings without tannaitic support but they created fences around the Torah to prevent inadvertent sins. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. ” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.
