Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Amoraim cannot disagreement tannaitic rulings rather than tannaitic support nonetheless composed walls in the Torah to end inadvertent sins
That it statement because of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi generally removed every menstruating female in the typical monthly period category and you can placed him or her from the unusual standing out-of zava because most typical attacks past at the least 3 days. Frequently his concern are one to considering the complex clarifications wanted to determine whenever you’re niddah just in case you can become a zava, you to definitely you’ll started to not work right with grievous outcomes. Initial the decree got minimal feeling; it looks to own come regional, that will had been limited to times when question are inside together with local society wasn’t sufficiently learned to decide into the such as facts ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Indeed it wasn’t a standard decree for all away from Israel, however it are the initial step because advice. In the 1st several examples, Rabbi’s declaration works with a female just who is generally a small zava or may be good niddah. She actually is managed in the 1st case while the an effective niddah, which have a great seven-time ages of impurity, in place of one-day out-of impurity for the day out of hemorrhaging, the laws to possess a minor zava. Regarding second example she is handled because a great niddah and you will a zava in the event the first day is from inside the the lady ziva several months (the new 11 weeks between menstrual attacks). In the third disease, she’s handled as a complete zava. The three rulings make the way more strict condition.
Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C mГsto.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.
