Ross, Cody T., Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Seung-Yun Oh, Samuel Bowles, Bret Beheim, John Bunce, . “Correction so you can: ‘Greater money inequality, quicker polygyny: rethinking brand new polygyny endurance model’.” Journal of Royal Society software 15 (147): 20180752.
Sellen, Daniel W., and you can Daniel J. Hruschka. 2004. “Extracted-eating financing-safeguards polygyny during the native western north american Communities at the get in touch with.” Current anthropology forty-five (5): 707–fourteen. Silas, Ellis. 1926. A primitive Arcadia. London: T. Fisher Unwin Ltd. Spencer, Herbert. 1876. Standards from Sociology: Vol. step 1. London: Appleton.
Starkweather, Katherine E., and Raymond Hames. 2012. “A survey regarding Low-Traditional Polyandry.” Human instinct 23 (2): 149–72. Textor, Robert B. 1967. A cross-Social Realization. The new Sanctuary, CT: HRAF Force.
White, Douglas R., and you may Michael L. Burton. 1988. “Factors that cause Polygyny: Ecology, Discount, Kinship, and you will Warfare.” Western anthropologist 90 (4): 871–87.
Whiting, John W. Meters. 1964. “Outcomes of environment on the particular social methods.” Within the Explorations into the Cultural Anthropology: Essays honoring George Peter Murdock, edited by Ward Check Goodenough, 511–forty-two. New york, NY: McGraw-Mountain.
Whiting, John W. Yards., and you can Beatrice B. Whiting. 1975. “Aloofness and you will Intimacy out of Husbands and you can Spouses: A combination-Cultural Studies.” Ethos 3 (2): 183–207.
- Brand new rates are from new Ethnographic Atlas Murdock (1962–1971) once the recovered off in D-Put.org (Kirby et al. 2016) ??
- These types of figures are derived from studies about Important Get across Cultural Sample which were coded from the Broude and you may Greene (1985) ; these data into the relationships had been retrieved from D-Place varying SCCS739. Of one’s 148 societies from the Basic Get across Cultural Take to which Broude and Eco-friendly coded 30.1% has actually complete personal choices, 17.6% possess individual options that requires parental approval, 3.4% provides personal possibilities which also need parental arrangement, 18.2% enjoys both individual solutions otherwise setup relationship, 16.9% possess set-up wedding, however, men and women have the ability to target, and you will twelve.8% has actually totally install marriage.??
- This new numbers inside section and in the latest Contour is oriented into the research on Fundamental Get across-Cultural Decide to try (Murdock and you will Light 1969) ; this type of study on the polygyny was in fact recovered out of D-Set varying SCCS211. The standard Get across-Cultural Decide to try (SCCS) is a sample out of 185 communities. Figures from the SCCS including told new integrated cake graph below.??
- There are only dos polyandrous communities on SCCS.??
- Of the various type of polygyny, restricted is actually most common, followed closely by nonsororal polygyny, following sororal polygyny.??
- A corner-kinds study of animals and you may birds Meters. Ember and you will Ember (1979) found that too much ladies including predict polygynous rather than monogamous connecting. Certain research has not located service toward sex proportion idea, however, strategies from polygyny was indeed other (Hooper 2006; Quinlan and you may Quinlan 2007) otherwise varying was imputed (Minocher, Duda, and you will Jaeggi 2019) .??
Regarding the Peoples Relations Urban area Records
People Relations Area Data, Inc. ( HRAF ) is actually an internationally acknowledged team in the field of cultural anthropology. The purpose is to prompt and you can support brand new cross-social examination of human culture, people and you can behavior in past times and provide.
EHRAF Database
- eHRAF Globe Cultures
- eHRAF Archaeology
Contact HRAF
- Tel: 203-764-9401
Plain old treatment for attempt ideas should be to evaluate societies with and you can in place of a customary characteristic to find out if the fresh variation is actually predict unverzichtbarer Link of the adaptation during the a believed causal foundation. If you find yourself such as for instance examination can’t be used instead variation to examine, conclusion in other creature species could possibly get reveal this type of ideas. Obviously, we simply cannot speak about matrimony various other types, however, we are able to check kinds with a few balance when you look at the male-women mating and you may evaluate these with types lacking one stability.
Various other societies, social recognition out of wedding is dependent on a successful trial months. The fresh new Guarani out of South america practice trial relationship, in which authoritative relationship processes is actually deferred until following the possible bridegroom proves their viability having relationships. Schaden and Lewinsohn (1962) informs us you to
Society exogamy/endogamy
Of a lot anthropological membership statement jealousy certainly one of co-spouses. ) find in about ninety% of one’s communities having co-wives, ethnographers report sexual and you may mental dispute plus they finish one to conflict is more-or-faster a common when you look at the polygynous communities. Polygynous societies appear to have taken care of immediately jealousy having certain common culture and you will legislation that include: having independent house and you can kitchen areas getting nonsororal co-spouses, with statutes throughout the husbands revealing resources equitably, and achieving rules having asleep with co-spouses when you look at the rotation (C. Roentgen. Ember, Ember, and you can Peregrine 2019, 245) . Offered considerable jealousy, particular anthropologists see it puzzling you to polygyny can be so commonplace (age.grams., M. Ember (1974) ).
Have there been architectural factors which will help united states take into account different separation rates? Even though some search supports the concept that societies which have matrilocal home become more knowledgeable of breakup (Minturn, Grosse, and you will Haider 1969) , most other lookup will not discover relationships instance strong when other activities was controlled (Ackerman 1963; Pearson and you may Hendrix 1979) . Ackerman (1963) implies that the levels to which a partner is actually included in a good society’s descent build is much more predictive. Particularly incorporation should be just before age neighborhood, or it can exist just after marriage, eg becoming cared for by the a ily. Ackerman (1963) finds one
Goody, Jack. 1973. “Bridewealth and Dowry for the Africa and you may Eurasia.” In the Bridewealth and you can Dowry, modified because of the Jack Goody and S. J. Tambiah, 1–58. Cambridge Documents inside the Public Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge College or university Force.
